| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
361. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just to re-iterate. No problem with them being mobile damage dealers. Just be conscious of why people use and don't use certain ships (surviviblity) and just how in compatible hybrids and untangle bonused torps are to "kiting".
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.04 13:51:00
|
362. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think you'll find t2 ships and teirs also contributed to the opinion that specialised t1 ships suck.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.04 13:49:00
|
363. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Looking forward to testing on Sisi... Although you've probably already read my thoughts on the matter.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.04 13:46:00
|
364. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If they are so tightly focused they should become tech 2. Tech 1 hasnt been, can't be and shouldn't be so niche
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.04 13:38:00
|
365. I for one, Am not happy with no new nebulae in Wormhole space. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katrina Oniseki wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: I too am disapointed. Given how long the base artwork took to create for k-space, I doubt there will be any changes to w-space backdrops anytime soon... Maybe just paint it black.... /emo. I...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.03 19:33:00
|
366. I for one, Am not happy with no new nebulae in Wormhole space. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I too am disapointed. Given how long the base artwork took to create for k-space, I doubt there will be any changes to w-space backdrops anytime soon... Maybe just paint it black.... /emo.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.03 19:30:00
|
367. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Kidd wrote: Smoking Blunts wrote: even with a pinch of salt, it still sucks to see a ship that looks awesom on paper, to suddenly look bad on that same paper. these bc's need to be good at soemthing and they looked like they were going t...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.03 01:39:00
|
368. Sticky:New dev blog: Hybrid weapon and Tech II ammo balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
HELIC0N ONE wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: Re rigs: Rigs: - Armour Rig penalties changed from -% speed to -10% shield HP - Shield Rig penalties changed from +% signature to -10% armour HP Done. If you're going to switch the penalties to th...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.03 00:26:00
|
369. Sticky:New dev blog: Hybrid weapon and Tech II ammo balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Re rigs: Rigs: - Armour Rig penalties changed from -% speed to -10% shield HP - Shield Rig penalties changed from +% signature to -10% armour HP Done.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.03 00:06:00
|
370. Sticky:New dev blog: Hybrid weapon and Tech II ammo balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
A few primers for ship balancing... Maybe the active tanking bonus on Gallente t1 hulls (and commandships) needs to be re thought? (as every one of those ships is a problem one) Compare an active tanking Hyperion as best as you can with an activ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 23:43:00
|
371. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: I will say that I think they are angling for the Talos "primary" role to be a rail boat for roaming and secondarily a blaster boat when camping, etc.... but that's just my uninformed t...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 21:38:00
|
372. Blaster & Fittings requirements are not only the inherent problem with Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RankShipsKills 1Hurricane5542 2Drake5454 3Abaddon2772 4Armageddon1965 5Dramiel1470 6Tempest1252 7Cynabal1196 8Zealot1072 9Sabre978 10Rapier884 11Tengu832 12Harbinger782 13Vagabond768 14Manticore735 15Scimitar688 16Nyx681 17Hound634 18Machariel607 ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 21:05:00
|
373. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pattern Clarc wrote: For some reason, this thread appears to be full of people pissed off that I haven't waited till december before providing feedback. Yep. How silly of me, I should have waited till point in time were the developers had alrea...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 20:42:00
|
374. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: I will say that I think they are angling for the Talos "primary" role to be a rail boat for roaming and secondarily a blaster boat when camping, etc.... but that's just my uninformed take on the matter right now. We'll have to ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 20:36:00
|
375. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
For some reason, this thread appears to be full of people pissed off that I haven't waited till december before providing feedback. Yep. How silly of me, I should have waited till point in time were the developers had already poored hundreds of ma...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 20:08:00
|
376. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship-troduction: The Amarr Oracle - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
You no longer have any excuses for not training amarr.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 18:17:00
|
377. Sticky:New dev blog: Hybrid weapon and Tech II ammo balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
thoth rothschild wrote: The best deimos fix is already on tranquility. it is called adrestia. perfect blaster boat, perfect hybrid fix now compare adrestia with deimos and it will be clear why it is perfect. Either that or the proteus. 900dp...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 17:30:00
|
378. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
@hans Not too worried about the Tornado or the Oracle as the weapons systems are compatible with what I think is the concept of the ship class. Talos and to an increasing extent, Naga are in bad shape.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 12:01:00
|
379. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Take this thread as an example of our enthusiasm - and worry when expansions come and go without pages of OMGWTF. But still, many of us have been burnt by too many "player testing" periods to take this one lying down. So expect vigorous debate.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 10:47:00
|
380. This expansion just became 25% less awesome? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
People go "OMG" it has BS sized guns!! Which means fuckall without context. The main advantage of BS guns is range. Commandships or T3's can achieve "battleship" dps (or tank) with medium guns with the right bonuses. The problem with the Talos is...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.11.02 08:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |